Author: Idrees Ali, Reuters

  • Pentagon temporarily rescinds guidance on testosterone screening for US troops

    Pentagon temporarily rescinds guidance on testosterone screening for US troops

    The Pentagon is temporarily rescinding recently published clinical guidance for a new, mandatory testosterone-deficiency screening policy for service members aged 30 and older, a U.S. official told Reuters on Thursday.

    On Wednesday, the Pentagon posted the “Clinical Guidance for Health and Human Performance Optimization” on its website. By Thursday, the memo and an accompanying statement from spokesperson Sean Parnell had been removed.

    “The draft (document) published on September 2, 2026, has been temporarily rescinded to allow for updates,” the official said, adding that interim guidance remains in effect.

    The detailed clinical guidelines had laid out separate testosterone deficiency screening paths for men and women that were to happen during their annual health assessments.

    The guidance was set to take effect immediately, and the ​Pentagon said it is aimed at improving military readiness by ​identifying and managing hormonal and energy-availability issues.

    “Page Not Found” appeared on websites for both the Pentagon and Defense Health Agency when clicking on links for the memo and statement.

    Wednesday’s guidance said that men aged 30 and older would be screened through a questionnaire that could then trigger a blood test for testosterone levels and, if needed, testosterone hormone therapy.

    Women would also be screened through a questionnaire, which could then move to treatment for conditions related to hormonal imbalance. Testosterone would be used in women only for one of the diagnoses for which there is evidence of efficacy, such as Hypoactive Sexual Desire Disorder, characterized by a distressing level of low sexual interest.

    This post was originally published on this site.

  • Fort Knox soldier identified after fatal motor pool accident

    Fort Knox soldier identified after fatal motor pool accident

    U.S. Army officials identified the soldier who died this week from injuries sustained during an accident at an on-post motor pool at Fort Knox, Kentucky.

    Staff Sgt. Deonte Lamar Davis, assigned to the 19th Engineer Battalion, 20th Engineer Brigade, XVII Airborne Corps, died on Tuesday at Fort Knox, Kentucky, according to a Wednesday statement.

    “We are deeply saddened by the tragic loss of Staff Sgt. Davis,” Col. Jeff Burges, commander of the 20th Engineer Brigade, said in the release. “He was an outstanding Soldier and leader, and will be deeply missed by all his family, friends and fellow soldiers across the formation.”

    Davis hailed from Daytona Beach, Florida, and he was a bridge crewmember assigned to the base since 2024.

    Preliminary information regarding the incident found that engineering equipment fell on Davis while he was working in the motor pool, according to a Tuesday base release shared with Military Times.

    Army motor pools are facilities where units maintain and work on vehicles, equipment and machinery.

    Emergency responders were called to the scene around 10:30 a.m. local time, and David received emergency medical care before being transported by air to University of Louisville Hospital. He was later pronounced dead, the release states.

    As part of the standard process for investigating soldiers’ fatalities, the incident is under investigation by the Department of the Army Criminal Investigation Division, but initial indications are that it was accidental.

    Davis’ awards include the Army Commendation Medal, two Army Achievement Medals, two Army Good Conduct Medals, National Defense Service Medal, Korea Defense Service Medal, Army Service Ribbon and Overseas Service Ribbon, per the release.

    This post was originally published on this site

  • The Army shut down a specialized drone unit. Legislators want to know why.

    The Army shut down a specialized drone unit. Legislators want to know why.

    A bipartisan group of lawmakers is pushing the Army to explain why it is shuttering a specialized drone battalion less than a year after establishing it, a move that comes as conflicts across the world have become increasingly defined by unmanned aerial systems and electronic warfare.

    The 600-member “Unmanned Assault Battalion,” created as part of the 173rd Airborne Brigade, was charged with learning tactics and skills from Ukraine’s more-than four-year fight against Russia and applying them to the U.S. military. In a letter, legislators expressed concern that eliminating the battalion was another sign of the Defense Department’s “uneven and inconsistent” support to Europe and Ukraine, and they questioned how the U.S. would continue to learn drone warfare from the Ukraine theater.

    “We have deep concerns that eliminating this specialized drone unit will limit our ability to learn from allies, particularly the Ukrainian Armed Forces, and hinder our efforts to modernize drone warfare at the speed necessary to compete on the modern battlefield,” Sens. Jeanne, Shahee, Thom Tillis, Angus King and Rep. Michael Turner, said in the Sept. 1 letter, provided by Sen. Shaheen’s office.

    “This specialized unit was a prudent response in a moment when the character of warfare is changing faster than a conventional formation’s ability to adapt,” the lawmakers said after asking if the decision to close the unit was made by the Army or based on guidance from Defense Department leadership. They asked for an explanation by Sept. 21.

    The unit is expected to return to its airborne infantry mission after participating in the multinational Exercise Saber Junction this month.

    In the letter, addressed to Acting Army Chief of Staff. Gen. Christopher LaNeve and outgoing Army Secretary Dan Driscoll, legislators said they understood the move to be a result of Gen. LaNeve’s “back to basics” message, where he ordered the force to focus on its primary combat mission.

    The Army has seen a massive leadership shakeup as Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth has fired over a dozen top leaders. Former Army Chief of Staff, Gen. Randy George, who championed drone innovation through his Transformation in Contact initiative, was ousted at Hegseth’s behest. He has not yet nominated a successor.

    Driscoll, who supported modernization measures and acquisition reform, resigned on short notice this week amid friction with Hegseth. His resignation further thins the Army’s top ranks as the country remains locked into a war with Iran that has now stretched over six months amid missile stockpile shortages and extended deployments.

    This post was originally published on this site

  • JourneyWoman Magazine September 2026 Letter from the Editor: Responsible Travel

    JourneyWoman Magazine September 2026 Letter from the Editor: Responsible Travel

    Dear JourneyWoman readers:

    As a reader of this website for the last seven years, and occasional panellist and contributor, I’m thrilled to take on the role of JourneyWoman’s executive editor, working with Carolyn and a roster of talented writers to both deepen and expand coverage of the issues that matter most to women travellers. 

    It’s fitting to join in time to work on this month’s theme, as I have been covering sustainable travel and related issues for most of my career, starting as an editor at National Geographic Traveler, and have tried to put it in practice, however imperfectly, in my own personal travels.

    There’s no way to put this gently, but the world’s government and business leaders have collectively failed us when it comes to the environment, that is, the interrelated systems that support our human lives–and inasmuch as we have voted those leaders in, we bear some responsibility. 

    Norie Quintos, our new Executive Editor 

    Scientists sounded the alarm more than 30 years ago. And their forecasts have come true, though even faster than they predicted. They warned that extreme weather events would be more frequent and intense. As an example, 23 of Europe’s 30 most severe heatwaves since 1950 have occurred since 2000—five of them in just the past three years, according to the European Commission’s Copernicus Climate Service. 

    The travel industry both contributes to—and more and more is disrupted by—climate change. A 2024 report in Nature Communications estimated that global tourism generated 5.2 gigatonnes of CO2 emissions in 2019—about 8.8 per cent of total global greenhouse-gas emissions, with aviation accounting for 52 per cent of the sector’s direct emissions.

    Overtourism is a separate but related issue. When tourism exceeds capacity, it degrades the environment, the liveability of places for residents, and also the visitor experience. The problem is worsening in many popular destinations as international travel rebounds from 2020: A 2025 UN tourism report cited 1.4 billion international arrivals in 2024, up 11 percent from 2023 and nearly equivalent to pre-pandemic numbers, with growth of a further 3 to 5 percent projected for 2025.

    What are individual travelers to do? Do we stop flying—one of tourism’s most climate-intensive activities? Well, some indeed have—and I applaud those who have made that decision. However, curiosity about the world and exploration are hard-wired in humans, and travel connects people to each other and brings with it innumerable physical, mental, and emotional benefits, so the answer if you love to travel is to make better choices. We can each opt for fewer plane trips and stay longer in the destination when we do fly; choose lower-carbon transport (train, bus, ferry); sign on with a tour operator with strong sustainability and social impact values; support local artisans when souvenir shopping, and support organizations doing good work. All the while demanding that our leaders prioritize the systemic changes that will make the most difference.

    One of the most powerful and underutilized tools women travellers have at their disposal is your wallets. Your travel dollars, spent thoughtfully, can support companies that act in ways that protect the places we love, and send a message to those that don’t. 

    The issues are complex and varied, so let’s learn together. This month’s articles will get you started or encourage you to go further on the journey. 

    With gratitude,

    Executive Editor, JourneyWoman
    editor@journeywoman.com

    readerable banner showing older woman on a computer

    readereable mobile banner

    The post JourneyWoman Magazine September 2026 Letter from the Editor: Responsible Travel appeared first on JourneyWoman.

    This post was originally published on this site.

  • Marines test next-gen combat utility uniforms

    Marines test next-gen combat utility uniforms

    The U.S. Marine Corps announced that it is currently evaluating the newest entry into the long lineage of its combat utility uniforms.

    The newest iteration was designed with feedback from service members to provide lightweight material and an updated fit for future field training and military operations.

    “Equipment must evolve continuously to outpace near-peer technological advancements and deliver peak capabilities to the Fleet Marine Force,” said Todd Towles, clothing and equipment team lead.

    The next-generation combat utility uniform also incorporates a crotch gusset to increase comfort and durability, as well as more sizing options for a wider variety of body types.

    The Marine Corps is currently in the testing and user evaluation phase of the rollout.

    On Aug. 4 and 5, the service issued the recently produced uniforms to command staff, drill instructors and recruits from three platoons in Alpha Company, 1st Battalion, at Marine Corps Recruit Depot Parris Island.

    Participants will wear the uniforms and provide their honest opinion at the end of a limited user evaluation period.

    The service also recently modernized how service members can access the guide for uniform standards.

    A new mobile app lets Marines check proper regulations for their outfit and grooming.

    Service members can toggle between different uniform categories, with descriptions that explain what activities those uniforms are allowed to be worn for.

    This post was originally published on this site.

  • My unit took on Ukraine’s ‘Nemesis’ drone hunters. Here’s what really happened.

    My unit took on Ukraine’s ‘Nemesis’ drone hunters. Here’s what really happened.

    This post was originally published on this site.

    On the morning of April 22, 2026, Blackhawk Company, 2nd Battalion, 7th Cavalry Regiment, began a 10-day collective training event at the Joint Multinational Readiness Center in Hohenfels, Germany.

    As Blackhawk Company rolled through the Bavarian countryside in a column of Bradley Fighting Vehicles, we didn’t realize our exercise would soon make national news in a Wall Street Journal article headlined “U.S. and Ukrainian Forces Went Head-to-Head in an Exercise. Ukraine’s Drones Won.”

    According to the newspaper, “during the exercise, called Combined Resolve, Ukrainian drone units easily spotted and defeated U.S. troops and armored vehicles on rotation from Fort Hood in Texas.” It was, the paper said, a “drubbing.”

    As the commander of Blackhawk Company during Combined Resolve, I don’t believe the article fully captures Blackhawk Company’s performance in Hohenfels, from our successes in the training scenarios to what we learned from the Ukrainians.

    Here is what really happened.

    Entering ‘The Box,’ watched from above

    As we headed toward the training area — a 14-by-27-kilometer range we universally called “the box” — we already knew that Hohenfels’ full-time opposition force, known as the Warrior Battalion, would be augmented by the Ukrainian Unmanned Systems Forces’ 412th Regiment, an elite unit known as “Nemesis.”

    Our soldiers had spent the previous days meeting and getting to know the Nemesis troops as we prepared for the exercise, learning about their real-world combat experience and checking out their gear. One soldier, our troops reported back, was said to have close to 500 battlefield kills.

    As we approached the box, Nemesis was already watching. As our mechanized company filed through the only gate into the training area — a textbook chokepoint — their reconnaissance drones were overhead.

    Our first mission was to prepare a defense. For several days, we built engagement areas, constructed fighting positions, and maneuvered to locate and destroy opposing forces.

    Above us, Ukrainian drones flew. Some were large enough that their propellers sounded like helicopters. Others were small and difficult to see until they buzzed past you amid the trees. We knew they were there, and we knew they were looking for us.

    We did not have counter-Unmanned Aircraft Systems (cUAS) capability that we would have wanted. Our brigade was not a Transformation-in-Contact (TiC) unit that places new, sometimes untested weapons and tech directly in the hands of soldiers.

    Perhaps the Army and industry partners have already developed a secret “win button” device for drone warfare. But if they did, we didn’t have it.

    But fighting a tilted, uphill battle against seasoned combat veterans is exactly what made the experience so valuable. We did not complain; we adapted, accepting that the sky — in perpetuity, not just sporadically — was now part of the battlefield.

    ‘Clearing the skies’ by changing tactics

    Within hours, we changed how we occupied positions. We improved concealment. We dispersed vehicles and personnel as widely as we could. We hid Bradleys in heavy trees, risking getting stuck in soft ground (and damaging expensive German trees) to mitigate the overhead threat.

    We became more deliberate about movement. We studied what we looked like from above, not just what we could see from the ground.

    We also threw a twist at Nemesis we knew they would not expect. The training center is densely vegetated, with hills cut by draws, valleys, and deep pockets of dead space. As a result, mechanzied units usually stick to small roads and trails — routes we knew Nemesis would dominate on.

    A Blackhawk Company soldier during Combined Resolve 2026.
    A Blackhawk Company soldier during Combined Resolve 2026. Photo courtesy of Capt. Allan Watson.

    So we headed into the steep gullies and heavy trees. More than once, I found myself standing sideways in the turret of our Bradley, barking orders as our platoons traversed 40-degree slopes, finding new routes to an objective. We were at our limits, but the terrain gave us natural concealment and terrain masking, and we took full advantage of it.

    The enemy still found us, but it’s important to understand how: even with drone reconnaissance, the enemy had to use traditional ground reconnaissance and infiltration techniques. While a drone could identify us from above, only troops on the ground could exploit the information. 

    As we fought, we lost Bradleys and tanks and some of the crew that manned them. Of course we did. This was training with the pressure dialed as high as we could get it to teach our formations tough lessons.

    However, the lesson from our time with Nemesis was not that heavy armor is obsolete or a liability against drones. Those vehicles carried us through terrain that would have slowed lighter formations and protected crews while we seized objectives. Our armor did not make us more vulnerable — it made us mobile, protected, and dangerous.

    Top Stories This Week

    Soldiers will be far more confident in spreading out if they believe in their equipment, like our Bradleys and Abrams tanks. It is a difficult environment, but I also learned how capable and adaptive our soldiers and formations are.

    On the sixth day, the formation moved from defensive to offensive operations. During the second half of the exercise, the same Ukrainian formation that had spent days hunting us from the air was now working alongside us. I watched our soldiers’ competence and confidence grow throughout the exercise. They began the training event knowing they were about to face a battlefield that would challenge assumptions they had trained with for years. They left knowing they could adapt when those assumptions stopped working.

    Our Ukrainian partners brought cutting-edge technology and techniques honed over years of combat operations. They showed us ways to effectively fly cheap drones incredible distances. They put on a masterclass in sensor-to-shooter kill chain management and speed using tactics, techniques, and technology that we can now use in our formations.

    But we also learned another key lesson: regardless of the technology, humans are still the critical component, and a weak point we learned to target.

    When we maneuvered and made the hunters of Nemesis feel like the hunted, the skies cleared up. 

    The post My unit took on Ukraine’s ‘Nemesis’ drone hunters. Here’s what really happened. appeared first on Task & Purpose.

  • Pentagon expands hormone screening guidance to include female service members

    Pentagon expands hormone screening guidance to include female service members

    The Defense Health Agency has explicitly established a hormone-screening pathway for female service members, directing providers to screen women annually for hormonal dysregulation and establishing clinical pathways for problems ranging from menstrual irregularities and fatigue to perimenopause and menopause.

    The Sept. 2 guidance, signed by DHA Director Vice Adm. Darin Via, establishes clinical pathways for female hormonal optimization and lays out when a woman should receive additional evaluation, what conditions providers should consider and when treatment or referral is warranted.

    A female Marine interviewed by Military Times said low testosterone can occur in women but can be harder to identify because women normally have much lower testosterone levels than men.

    “Low testosterone isn’t really a problem that affects women the same way as it affects men,” the Marine said.

    Unlike the mandatory testosterone blood testing for male service members aged 30 and older, the female pathway begins with an annual clinical screen for hormonal dysregulation during the Periodic Health Assessment, or PHA.

    Testosterone

    DHA identifies fatigue, musculoskeletal pain and changes in menstrual patterns, including cycles longer than 35 days, as signs that should prompt a targeted assessment for Relative Energy Deficiency in Sport, or RED-S.

    DHA says military operational demands, fitness standards and occupational stressors can increase the risk of RED-S, a condition associated with low energy availability that can contribute to bone-stress injuries, impaired endocrine function and lost operational readiness.

    If the initial assessment does not indicate concern for RED-S, no further evaluation is required under the DHA guidance. If concern remains, active-duty service members are referred to their primary care managers for further assessment and treatment.

    The next step can include a validated screening tool such as the Low Energy Availability in Females Questionnaire, followed by the International Olympic Committee’s RED-S Clinical Assessment Tool Version 2. That assessment places service members into four risk categories, ranging from low risk, with unrestricted training and duties, to high risk, where limited duty, medical profiling or hospitalization may be necessary.

    DHA also recognizes that one of the most visible indicators of RED-S can be obscured by treatment and notes that functional hypothalamic amenorrhea can be masked by hormonal contraception.

    At the same time, menstrual-cycle and sex-hormone indicators are not scored in the RED-S assessment for women taking thyroid or sex-hormone-altering medications, including hormonal contraceptives.

    When RED-S is suspected, clinicians can order blood tests including a complete blood count, comprehensive metabolic panel, ferritin, iron studies, vitamin B12 and thyroid-stimulating hormone. For women with prolonged or absent menstruation, pregnancy testing and additional hormone testing may be ordered when clinically indicated.

    Treatment focuses first on correcting the underlying energy deficit, which can mean increasing dietary energy intake, reducing training volume or both. DHA also calls for attention to protein, carbohydrates, calcium and vitamin D, with psychological support when disordered eating, body-image concerns or performance pressures are involved.

    Female service members aged 35 and older who report clinically significant symptoms of perimenopause or menopause are to be assessed for whether those symptoms affect operational duties or quality of life. If they do — or if the service member requests education or treatment — the provider is to refer her to a midlife-transition specialist.

    That specialist could be an obstetrician-gynecologist, certified nurse midwife, women’s health nurse practitioner, endocrinologist or primary care provider trained in perimenopause and menopause care. If appropriate expertise is unavailable locally, DHA directs providers to its Midlife Telehealth Hub.

    A Navy hospital corpsman interviewed by Military Times, says the military standard should remain the ability to perform the job.

    “As long as they are fit for duty, any medically optional test they would like to have is fine for me personally,” she said. “If a testosterone treatment makes you fit for duty, then great, get in there.”

    The DHA guidance addresses testosterone treatment for women within a narrow clinical context, citing the 2019 Global Consensus Position Statement on testosterone therapy, which identifies Hypoactive Sexual Desire Disorder, or HSDD, in postmenopausal women as the only evidence-based indication for testosterone therapy in women.

    The guidance does not establish a testosterone blood-test threshold for diagnosing HSDD. Instead, it calls for a clinical assessment, consideration of other causes and shared decision-making between the patient and provider.

    DHA says available evidence does not demonstrate a benefit from testosterone therapy for psychological well-being, depressive symptoms, cognitive performance, cardiovascular outcomes, bone mineral density, or muscle mass and performance. Evidence for treating HSDD with testosterone in perimenopausal women remains limited, according to the guidance.

    For a postmenopausal service member with a distressing decline in sexual function, DHA recommends addressing other possible causes before considering testosterone. If treatment is chosen, it is off-label: The guidance recommends one-tenth of an FDA-approved male 1% testosterone cream or gel.

    Those undergoing treatment will have their testosterone levels checked three to six weeks after treatment begins or after a dose increase, with the goal of keeping levels within the normal premenopausal female range.

    DHA recommends stopping treatment after six months if there is no demonstrated benefit. For women who remain on treatment, the guidance calls for clinical evaluation and testosterone testing every four to six months.

    The agency also cautions that safety data for physiologic testosterone treatment in women do not extend beyond 24 months and recommends caution for women with hormone-sensitive breast cancer or high cardiometabolic risk.

    The guidance takes effect immediately and expires one year after its Sept. 2 signature unless DHA reissues or cancels it earlier.

    This post was originally published on this site.

  • Pentagon expands hormone screening guidance to include female service members

    Pentagon expands hormone screening guidance to include female service members

    The Defense Health Agency has explicitly established a hormone-screening pathway for female service members, directing providers to screen women annually for hormonal dysregulation and establishing clinical pathways for problems ranging from menstrual irregularities and fatigue to perimenopause and menopause.

    The Sept. 2 guidance, signed by DHA Director Vice Adm. Darin Via, establishes clinical pathways for female hormonal optimization and lays out when a woman should receive additional evaluation, what conditions providers should consider and when treatment or referral is warranted.

    A female Marine interviewed by Military Times said low testosterone can occur in women but can be harder to identify because women normally have much lower testosterone levels than men.

    “Low testosterone isn’t really a problem that affects women the same way as it affects men,” the Marine said.

    Unlike the mandatory testosterone blood testing for male service members aged 30 and older, the female pathway begins with an annual clinical screen for hormonal dysregulation during the Periodic Health Assessment, or PHA.

    Testosterone

    DHA identifies fatigue, musculoskeletal pain and changes in menstrual patterns, including cycles longer than 35 days, as signs that should prompt a targeted assessment for Relative Energy Deficiency in Sport, or RED-S.

    DHA says military operational demands, fitness standards and occupational stressors can increase the risk of RED-S, a condition associated with low energy availability that can contribute to bone-stress injuries, impaired endocrine function and lost operational readiness.

    If the initial assessment does not indicate concern for RED-S, no further evaluation is required under the DHA guidance. If concern remains, active-duty service members are referred to their primary care managers for further assessment and treatment.

    The next step can include a validated screening tool such as the Low Energy Availability in Females Questionnaire, followed by the International Olympic Committee’s RED-S Clinical Assessment Tool Version 2. That assessment places service members into four risk categories, ranging from low risk, with unrestricted training and duties, to high risk, where limited duty, medical profiling or hospitalization may be necessary.

    DHA also recognizes that one of the most visible indicators of RED-S can be obscured by treatment and notes that functional hypothalamic amenorrhea can be masked by hormonal contraception.

    At the same time, menstrual-cycle and sex-hormone indicators are not scored in the RED-S assessment for women taking thyroid or sex-hormone-altering medications, including hormonal contraceptives.

    When RED-S is suspected, clinicians can order blood tests including a complete blood count, comprehensive metabolic panel, ferritin, iron studies, vitamin B12 and thyroid-stimulating hormone. For women with prolonged or absent menstruation, pregnancy testing and additional hormone testing may be ordered when clinically indicated.

    Treatment focuses first on correcting the underlying energy deficit, which can mean increasing dietary energy intake, reducing training volume or both. DHA also calls for attention to protein, carbohydrates, calcium and vitamin D, with psychological support when disordered eating, body-image concerns or performance pressures are involved.

    Female service members aged 35 and older who report clinically significant symptoms of perimenopause or menopause are to be assessed for whether those symptoms affect operational duties or quality of life. If they do — or if the service member requests education or treatment — the provider is to refer her to a midlife-transition specialist.

    That specialist could be an obstetrician-gynecologist, certified nurse midwife, women’s health nurse practitioner, endocrinologist or primary care provider trained in perimenopause and menopause care. If appropriate expertise is unavailable locally, DHA directs providers to its Midlife Telehealth Hub.

    A Navy hospital corpsman interviewed by Military Times, says the military standard should remain the ability to perform the job.

    “As long as they are fit for duty, any medically optional test they would like to have is fine for me personally,” she said. “If a testosterone treatment makes you fit for duty, then great, get in there.”

    The DHA guidance addresses testosterone treatment for women within a narrow clinical context, citing the 2019 Global Consensus Position Statement on testosterone therapy, which identifies Hypoactive Sexual Desire Disorder, or HSDD, in postmenopausal women as the only evidence-based indication for testosterone therapy in women.

    The guidance does not establish a testosterone blood-test threshold for diagnosing HSDD. Instead, it calls for a clinical assessment, consideration of other causes and shared decision-making between the patient and provider.

    DHA says available evidence does not demonstrate a benefit from testosterone therapy for psychological well-being, depressive symptoms, cognitive performance, cardiovascular outcomes, bone mineral density, or muscle mass and performance. Evidence for treating HSDD with testosterone in perimenopausal women remains limited, according to the guidance.

    For a postmenopausal service member with a distressing decline in sexual function, DHA recommends addressing other possible causes before considering testosterone. If treatment is chosen, it is off-label: The guidance recommends one-tenth of an FDA-approved male 1% testosterone cream or gel.

    Those undergoing treatment will have their testosterone levels checked three to six weeks after treatment begins or after a dose increase, with the goal of keeping levels within the normal premenopausal female range.

    DHA recommends stopping treatment after six months if there is no demonstrated benefit. For women who remain on treatment, the guidance calls for clinical evaluation and testosterone testing every four to six months.

    The agency also cautions that safety data for physiologic testosterone treatment in women do not extend beyond 24 months and recommends caution for women with hormone-sensitive breast cancer or high cardiometabolic risk.

    The guidance takes effect immediately and expires one year after its Sept. 2 signature unless DHA reissues or cancels it earlier.

    This post was originally published on this site.

  • Pentagon expands hormone screening guidance to include female service members

    Pentagon expands hormone screening guidance to include female service members

    The Defense Health Agency has explicitly established a hormone-screening pathway for female service members, directing providers to screen women annually for hormonal dysregulation and establishing clinical pathways for problems ranging from menstrual irregularities and fatigue to perimenopause and menopause.

    The Sept. 2 guidance, signed by DHA Director Vice Adm. Darin Via, establishes clinical pathways for female hormonal optimization and lays out when a woman should receive additional evaluation, what conditions providers should consider and when treatment or referral is warranted.

    A female Marine interviewed by Military Times said low testosterone can occur in women but can be harder to identify because women normally have much lower testosterone levels than men.

    “Low testosterone isn’t really a problem that affects women the same way as it affects men,” the Marine said.

    Unlike the mandatory testosterone blood testing for male service members aged 30 and older, the female pathway begins with an annual clinical screen for hormonal dysregulation during the Periodic Health Assessment, or PHA.

    Testosterone

    DHA identifies fatigue, musculoskeletal pain and changes in menstrual patterns, including cycles longer than 35 days, as signs that should prompt a targeted assessment for Relative Energy Deficiency in Sport, or RED-S.

    DHA says military operational demands, fitness standards and occupational stressors can increase the risk of RED-S, a condition associated with low energy availability that can contribute to bone-stress injuries, impaired endocrine function and lost operational readiness.

    If the initial assessment does not indicate concern for RED-S, no further evaluation is required under the DHA guidance. If concern remains, active-duty service members are referred to their primary care managers for further assessment and treatment.

    The next step can include a validated screening tool such as the Low Energy Availability in Females Questionnaire, followed by the International Olympic Committee’s RED-S Clinical Assessment Tool Version 2. That assessment places service members into four risk categories, ranging from low risk, with unrestricted training and duties, to high risk, where limited duty, medical profiling or hospitalization may be necessary.

    DHA also recognizes that one of the most visible indicators of RED-S can be obscured by treatment and notes that functional hypothalamic amenorrhea can be masked by hormonal contraception.

    At the same time, menstrual-cycle and sex-hormone indicators are not scored in the RED-S assessment for women taking thyroid or sex-hormone-altering medications, including hormonal contraceptives.

    When RED-S is suspected, clinicians can order blood tests including a complete blood count, comprehensive metabolic panel, ferritin, iron studies, vitamin B12 and thyroid-stimulating hormone. For women with prolonged or absent menstruation, pregnancy testing and additional hormone testing may be ordered when clinically indicated.

    Treatment focuses first on correcting the underlying energy deficit, which can mean increasing dietary energy intake, reducing training volume or both. DHA also calls for attention to protein, carbohydrates, calcium and vitamin D, with psychological support when disordered eating, body-image concerns or performance pressures are involved.

    Female service members aged 35 and older who report clinically significant symptoms of perimenopause or menopause are to be assessed for whether those symptoms affect operational duties or quality of life. If they do — or if the service member requests education or treatment — the provider is to refer her to a midlife-transition specialist.

    That specialist could be an obstetrician-gynecologist, certified nurse midwife, women’s health nurse practitioner, endocrinologist or primary care provider trained in perimenopause and menopause care. If appropriate expertise is unavailable locally, DHA directs providers to its Midlife Telehealth Hub.

    A Navy hospital corpsman interviewed by Military Times, says the military standard should remain the ability to perform the job.

    “As long as they are fit for duty, any medically optional test they would like to have is fine for me personally,” she said. “If a testosterone treatment makes you fit for duty, then great, get in there.”

    The DHA guidance addresses testosterone treatment for women within a narrow clinical context, citing the 2019 Global Consensus Position Statement on testosterone therapy, which identifies Hypoactive Sexual Desire Disorder, or HSDD, in postmenopausal women as the only evidence-based indication for testosterone therapy in women.

    The guidance does not establish a testosterone blood-test threshold for diagnosing HSDD. Instead, it calls for a clinical assessment, consideration of other causes and shared decision-making between the patient and provider.

    DHA says available evidence does not demonstrate a benefit from testosterone therapy for psychological well-being, depressive symptoms, cognitive performance, cardiovascular outcomes, bone mineral density, or muscle mass and performance. Evidence for treating HSDD with testosterone in perimenopausal women remains limited, according to the guidance.

    For a postmenopausal service member with a distressing decline in sexual function, DHA recommends addressing other possible causes before considering testosterone. If treatment is chosen, it is off-label: The guidance recommends one-tenth of an FDA-approved male 1% testosterone cream or gel.

    Those undergoing treatment will have their testosterone levels checked three to six weeks after treatment begins or after a dose increase, with the goal of keeping levels within the normal premenopausal female range.

    DHA recommends stopping treatment after six months if there is no demonstrated benefit. For women who remain on treatment, the guidance calls for clinical evaluation and testosterone testing every four to six months.

    The agency also cautions that safety data for physiologic testosterone treatment in women do not extend beyond 24 months and recommends caution for women with hormone-sensitive breast cancer or high cardiometabolic risk.

    The guidance takes effect immediately and expires one year after its Sept. 2 signature unless DHA reissues or cancels it earlier.

    This post was originally published on this site.

  • Pentagon expands hormone screening guidance to include female service members

    Pentagon expands hormone screening guidance to include female service members

    The Defense Health Agency has explicitly established a hormone-screening pathway for female service members, directing providers to screen women annually for hormonal dysregulation and establishing clinical pathways for problems ranging from menstrual irregularities and fatigue to perimenopause and menopause.

    The Sept. 2 guidance, signed by DHA Director Vice Adm. Darin Via, establishes clinical pathways for female hormonal optimization and lays out when a woman should receive additional evaluation, what conditions providers should consider and when treatment or referral is warranted.

    A female Marine interviewed by Military Times said low testosterone can occur in women but can be harder to identify because women normally have much lower testosterone levels than men.

    “Low testosterone isn’t really a problem that affects women the same way as it affects men,” the Marine said.

    Unlike the mandatory testosterone blood testing for male service members aged 30 and older, the female pathway begins with an annual clinical screen for hormonal dysregulation during the Periodic Health Assessment, or PHA.

    Testosterone

    DHA identifies fatigue, musculoskeletal pain and changes in menstrual patterns, including cycles longer than 35 days, as signs that should prompt a targeted assessment for Relative Energy Deficiency in Sport, or RED-S.

    DHA says military operational demands, fitness standards and occupational stressors can increase the risk of RED-S, a condition associated with low energy availability that can contribute to bone-stress injuries, impaired endocrine function and lost operational readiness.

    If the initial assessment does not indicate concern for RED-S, no further evaluation is required under the DHA guidance. If concern remains, active-duty service members are referred to their primary care managers for further assessment and treatment.

    The next step can include a validated screening tool such as the Low Energy Availability in Females Questionnaire, followed by the International Olympic Committee’s RED-S Clinical Assessment Tool Version 2. That assessment places service members into four risk categories, ranging from low risk, with unrestricted training and duties, to high risk, where limited duty, medical profiling or hospitalization may be necessary.

    DHA also recognizes that one of the most visible indicators of RED-S can be obscured by treatment and notes that functional hypothalamic amenorrhea can be masked by hormonal contraception.

    At the same time, menstrual-cycle and sex-hormone indicators are not scored in the RED-S assessment for women taking thyroid or sex-hormone-altering medications, including hormonal contraceptives.

    When RED-S is suspected, clinicians can order blood tests including a complete blood count, comprehensive metabolic panel, ferritin, iron studies, vitamin B12 and thyroid-stimulating hormone. For women with prolonged or absent menstruation, pregnancy testing and additional hormone testing may be ordered when clinically indicated.

    Treatment focuses first on correcting the underlying energy deficit, which can mean increasing dietary energy intake, reducing training volume or both. DHA also calls for attention to protein, carbohydrates, calcium and vitamin D, with psychological support when disordered eating, body-image concerns or performance pressures are involved.

    Female service members aged 35 and older who report clinically significant symptoms of perimenopause or menopause are to be assessed for whether those symptoms affect operational duties or quality of life. If they do — or if the service member requests education or treatment — the provider is to refer her to a midlife-transition specialist.

    That specialist could be an obstetrician-gynecologist, certified nurse midwife, women’s health nurse practitioner, endocrinologist or primary care provider trained in perimenopause and menopause care. If appropriate expertise is unavailable locally, DHA directs providers to its Midlife Telehealth Hub.

    A Navy hospital corpsman interviewed by Military Times, says the military standard should remain the ability to perform the job.

    “As long as they are fit for duty, any medically optional test they would like to have is fine for me personally,” she said. “If a testosterone treatment makes you fit for duty, then great, get in there.”

    The DHA guidance addresses testosterone treatment for women within a narrow clinical context, citing the 2019 Global Consensus Position Statement on testosterone therapy, which identifies Hypoactive Sexual Desire Disorder, or HSDD, in postmenopausal women as the only evidence-based indication for testosterone therapy in women.

    The guidance does not establish a testosterone blood-test threshold for diagnosing HSDD. Instead, it calls for a clinical assessment, consideration of other causes and shared decision-making between the patient and provider.

    DHA says available evidence does not demonstrate a benefit from testosterone therapy for psychological well-being, depressive symptoms, cognitive performance, cardiovascular outcomes, bone mineral density, or muscle mass and performance. Evidence for treating HSDD with testosterone in perimenopausal women remains limited, according to the guidance.

    For a postmenopausal service member with a distressing decline in sexual function, DHA recommends addressing other possible causes before considering testosterone. If treatment is chosen, it is off-label: The guidance recommends one-tenth of an FDA-approved male 1% testosterone cream or gel.

    Those undergoing treatment will have their testosterone levels checked three to six weeks after treatment begins or after a dose increase, with the goal of keeping levels within the normal premenopausal female range.

    DHA recommends stopping treatment after six months if there is no demonstrated benefit. For women who remain on treatment, the guidance calls for clinical evaluation and testosterone testing every four to six months.

    The agency also cautions that safety data for physiologic testosterone treatment in women do not extend beyond 24 months and recommends caution for women with hormone-sensitive breast cancer or high cardiometabolic risk.

    The guidance takes effect immediately and expires one year after its Sept. 2 signature unless DHA reissues or cancels it earlier.

    This post was originally published on this site